A four-wheel micromobility vehicle under 50 kg, from vision to prototype design
From the founder's vision to a concept, and from the concept to a manufacturable prototype design, covering sketches, part design, assembly and the bill of materials.
- Fig.
- 1
- Title
- The platform, side and plan
- Kind
- Drawing, simplified, not to scale
- Source
- Drawn for this site
- Note
- Complete vehicle under 50 kg. Outline simplified from the design; only the overall width is marked.
- Role
- Sole vehicle platform design engineer
- Team
- Three-person micromobility startup
- Period
- Aug 2022 to Aug 2024
- Mass
- Under 50 kg complete, summed from the bill of materials
- Width
- No wider than 95 cm
- Status
- First prototype in production
- Tools
- SolidWorks, ANSYS, Lotus Suspension Analysis, Adams Car, Excel
- Note
- Company, brand and product withheld under NDA; figures are simplified or masked.
The brief
I took the founder's brief, a sporty four-wheeler narrow enough for a bicycle lane, light and cheap to make at small volume, and before any detailed design benchmarked comparable vehicles of 100 to 200 kg, mapped the architecture and drivetrain options and checked the packaging of each layout, so no concept failed late. I put the trade-offs of weight, cost, complexity and performance to the founder in business terms.
Fig. 1 is where that ended: four wheels inside 95 cm, and under 50 kg complete by the bill of materials, less than half the mass of the lightest vehicle benchmarked. The structure the suspension mounts to was another engineer's work; I aligned my mounts and load paths with it.
One corner, two load paths
I designed the corner as a hybrid of the wishbone and McPherson layouts. The upright is fixed to a single lower wishbone, which sets the camber and takes the cornering and braking loads; the damper sits on a triangular mount where the two meet, on joints free to rotate, so it carries axial force only and an off-the-shelf bicycle damper does the job. The tie rod matches the wishbone's length and pivot axis, so bump steer is zero by geometry.
Fig. 2 is that corner as a free-body diagram: the side and fore-aft forces at the contact patch end in the wishbone's pivots, and the damper takes its share of the vertical load along its own axis. Fig. 3 is how it was signed off: the register's checks on the wishbone tubes, the damper mount, the steering knuckle and its bearing, each with its load case, the kind of loading, the material and the source of the check.
- Fig.
- 2
- Title
- The corner as a free-body diagram
- Kind
- Schematic, principle only, not to scale
- Source
- Drawn for this site
- Note
- The damper sits on joints free to rotate, so it carries axial force only, no side load and no bending. The tie rod has the wishbone's length and its inboard joint on the wishbone's pivot axis: bump steer zero by geometry. The moment balance shows the vertical load only.
| System | Part | Load case | Loading | Forces, moments | Stresses | Material | Safety factors (tension, shear, bearing) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspension | Wishbone tubes | Braking + cornering, 0.55 g + 0.55 g | Bending and axial force | AL 6061 T6 | FEA | |||
| Suspension | Wishbone tubes | Max heave, 2 g | Bending | AL 6061 T6 | Bending+Torque | |||
| Suspension | Damper mount | Max heave, 3 g, stiffest damper | Tension | AL 6061 T6 | FEA | |||
| Suspension | Steering knuckle | Max braking, 0.7 g | Tension | AL 7075 T6 | FEA | |||
| Suspension | Knuckle bearing | Braking + cornering, 0.55 g + 0.55 g | Bearing reaction | Bearing | Bearing Loads |
- Fig.
- 3
- Title
- The corner in the register: 5 of 77 checks
- Kind
- Workbook extract, values masked
- Source
- The project's design calculators
More depth: the motion ratio, the camber gain and why the corner is built this way
Designed for manufacture
I redrew the suspension mounts, which the packaging study had left as complex 3D forms, as laser-cut and bent sheet metal with every pickup where it was, and checked them again in FEA against the same load cases. I carried the change into the drawings and the bill of materials and sourced the machining and fabrication suppliers; the mounts cost much less to make.
Steering, brakes and drivetrain
I designed the clean-sheet steering knuckle and joints the new geometry needed, with the rotor, hub, caliper, disc adaptors and drive axle of the same corner, and checked each for stress and fatigue against its own load cases. Fig. 4 is three of those checks from the register: the caliper adaptor, the drive shaft and the hub splines, each signed off by FEA or a hand calculation.
| System | Part | Load case | Loading | Forces, moments | Stresses | Material | Safety factors (tension, shear, bearing) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brakes | Caliper adaptor | Max braking, 0.7 g | Tension | AL 7075 T6 | FEA | |||
| Drivetrain | Drive shaft | Max acceleration | Torsion | AL 7075 T6 | Bending+Torque | |||
| Suspension | Hub splines | Max braking, 0.7 g | Shear | AL 7075 T6 | Spline |
- Fig.
- 4
- Title
- Brakes and drivetrain in the register: 3 of 77 checks
- Kind
- Workbook extract, values masked
- Source
- The project's design calculators
The belt drivetrain of the motor-assisted drive serves front, rear or four-wheel drive from one layout; I routed it with the belt supplier for the hardest case, the multi-bend four-wheel-drive path, and chose the bearings from SKF's catalogue against life and friction calculations.
Two calculation tools
I built two calculation tools: a linked performance model (Fig. 5) for what the vehicle can do with a given layout, and twelve design calculators (Fig. 6) for what each part has to carry.
- formulas
- 288
- linked sheets
- 3
- calculation blocks
- 30
- dependencies between blocks
- 68
- of them across sheets
- 24
- drive layouts
- 4
- use cases
- 5
User Interface: inputs
Vehicle Data
Vehicle Dynamics
User Interface: calculations
User Interface: outputs
User Interface: inputs
- Vehicle specs 5 f
- Cornering case
- Stopping case
- Power case 1 f
- Top-speed case 1 f
- Gradient case
Vehicle Data
- Basic vehicle data 6 f
- Masses and CG, by assembly 55 f
- Powertrain and drivetrain settings 19 f
Vehicle Dynamics
- Vehicle data, as used 23 f
- Scenario input 1 f
Vehicle Dynamics, continued
- Static weight distribution 5 f
- Lateral weight transfer 10 f
- Longitudinal weight transfer 5 f
- Load on a slope 8 f
Vehicle Dynamics, continued
- Tyre forces and limits 20 f
- Braking 2 f
- Cornering 1 f
- Static rollover angles 3 f
Vehicle Dynamics, continued
- Motor power 13 f
- Top speed 13 f
- Gradient 12 f
User Interface: calculations
- Motor power 28 f
- Top speed 6 f
- Gradient 6 f
User Interface: outputs
- Max cornering speed 1 f
- Min stopping distance 1 f
- Required motor power 15 f
- Achievable top speed 15 f
- Achievable gradient 13 f
- Fig.
- 5
- Title
- The performance model's calculation graph
- Kind
- Model graph, from the formulas
- Source
- The project's performance model
- Note
- Blocks are the sheets' own sections; a number is the formulas in that block; a line is a dependency, thicker for more references, in the accent when it crosses sheets. 71 of 288 formulas cross a sheet: change any input and every output updates.
1. Vehicle level
Lateral force against slip angle and load for the candidate tyres
Masses, track, wheelbase, CG and roll centres to the vertical, longitudinal and lateral force at each wheel, per case
Lateral acceleration from speed and corner radius
Air, rolling and gradient resistance, power and ratios for front, rear and four-wheel drive
2. Loads into the structure
Seven cases, four corners: the forces at the wishbone and damper pickups
Castor, trail, kingpin inclination and scrub radius to the steering forces and effort
Wheel loads in cornering and combined cases
3. Part checks
Shaft bending and torsion, principal stresses and safety factors by material
Shear and compressive stress in splined shafts and hubs
Static and dynamic bearing reactions against the catalogue ratings
Alternating and mean stress, surface, loading and size factors; life in kilometres from the S-N data and the load encounters per kilometre, with the Goodman, Gerber and Soderberg mean-stress criteria
Outside the workbook: 26 of the register's checks, with load cases from Chassis Loadcases
4. Register
77 checks on 48 parts in four systems: load case, loading, stresses, material, three safety factors and the source of each check
- Fig.
- 6
- Title
- The design calculators: twelve sheets in the order the loads travel
- Kind
- Calculator map, values masked
- Source
- The project's design calculators
- Note
- One arrow per stage, labelled with what it carries: each stage's results are the next stage's inputs. Dashed: outside the workbook.
| Load case | Load factor | Pickup loaded | Held fixed | FL | FR | RL | RR | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fz | Fy | Fx | Fz | Fy | Fx | Fz | Fy | Fx | Fz | Fy | Fx | ||||
| Max shock | damper | wishbone, fore and aft | |||||||||||||
| Max heave | 2 g | wishbone, fore | damper | ||||||||||||
| wishbone, aft | |||||||||||||||
| Max acceleration | wishbone, fore | damper | |||||||||||||
| wishbone, aft | |||||||||||||||
| Max braking | 0.7 g | wishbone, fore | damper | ||||||||||||
| wishbone, aft | |||||||||||||||
| Max cornering | 0.9 g | wishbone, fore | damper | ||||||||||||
| wishbone, aft | |||||||||||||||
| Acceleration + cornering | 0.55 g + 0.55 g | wishbone, fore | damper | ||||||||||||
| wishbone, aft | |||||||||||||||
| Braking + cornering | 0.55 g + 0.55 g | wishbone, fore | damper | ||||||||||||
| wishbone, aft | |||||||||||||||
Held fixed: the wishbone, fore and aft, when the damper pickup is loaded; the damper in every other case.
- Fig.
- 7
- Title
- Chassis load cases: seven cases, four corners, 156 values
- Kind
- Workbook extract, load factors shown, forces masked
- Source
- The project's design calculators
The performance model (Fig. 5) answers the design questions directly: choose a drive layout, chain or belt, a road surface, a slope and a wind, and its three linked sheets return the maximum cornering speed, stopping distance, required motor power, top speed, gradient capability and a g-g diagram.
The twelve design calculators (Fig. 6) carry the loads in the order they travel, from tyre data and weight transfer to the forces at each pickup, then to each part's stresses, fatigue life and safety factors. Each stage's results are the next stage's inputs, and the register at the end names the source of every check. Fig. 7 is the hand-off from the vehicle to the parts: seven load cases, from maximum shock to braking while cornering, as forces at the wishbone and damper pickups of all four wheels.
More depth: what each calculator computes, the combined cases and the whole register, 2 more figures
Release package
I released production-level 2D drawings and a bill of materials with the system structure, part numbers, quantities and the cumulative weight of every part; summed, it gives the mass in the title block.