Skip to content

A four-wheel micromobility vehicle under 50 kg, from vision to prototype design

From the founder's vision to a concept, and from the concept to a manufacturable prototype design, covering sketches, part design, assembly and the bill of materials.

Side view≤95 cm1corner, Fig. 2Plan view
Fig.
1
Title
The platform, side and plan
Kind
Drawing, simplified, not to scale
Source
Drawn for this site
Note
Complete vehicle under 50 kg. Outline simplified from the design; only the overall width is marked.
Role
Sole vehicle platform design engineer
Team
Three-person micromobility startup
Period
Aug 2022 to Aug 2024
Mass
Under 50 kg complete, summed from the bill of materials
Width
No wider than 95 cm
Status
First prototype in production
Tools
SolidWorks, ANSYS, Lotus Suspension Analysis, Adams Car, Excel
Note
Company, brand and product withheld under NDA; figures are simplified or masked.

The brief

I took the founder's brief, a sporty four-wheeler narrow enough for a bicycle lane, light and cheap to make at small volume, and before any detailed design benchmarked comparable vehicles of 100 to 200 kg, mapped the architecture and drivetrain options and checked the packaging of each layout, so no concept failed late. I put the trade-offs of weight, cost, complexity and performance to the founder in business terms.

Fig. 1 is where that ended: four wheels inside 95 cm, and under 50 kg complete by the bill of materials, less than half the mass of the lightest vehicle benchmarked. The structure the suspension mounts to was another engineer's work; I aligned my mounts and load paths with it.

One corner, two load paths

I designed the corner as a hybrid of the wishbone and McPherson layouts. The upright is fixed to a single lower wishbone, which sets the camber and takes the cornering and braking loads; the damper sits on a triangular mount where the two meet, on joints free to rotate, so it carries axial force only and an off-the-shelf bicycle damper does the job. The tie rod matches the wishbone's length and pivot axis, so bump steer is zero by geometry.

Fig. 2 is that corner as a free-body diagram: the side and fore-aft forces at the contact patch end in the wishbone's pivots, and the damper takes its share of the vertical load along its own axis. Fig. 3 is how it was signed off: the register's checks on the wishbone tubes, the damper mount, the steering knuckle and its bearing, each with its load case, the kind of loading, the material and the source of the check.

Plan, front ←LL6tie rod1 tyre2 upright, fixed to3 lower wishbone4 damper mount5 damper, axial force only6 tie rodFd​ · rd​ = Fz​ · rw​about the pivot axisMR = Δsd​ / Δzw​bodyFz​Fy​Fx​Ry​Rz​Rx​Fd​rw​rd​12345bodyFz​Fy​Fx​Ry​Rz​Rx​Fd​rw​rd​12345Plan, front ←LL6tie rod1 tyre2 upright, fixed to3 lower wishbone4 damper mount5 damper, axial force only6 tie rodFd​ · rd​ = Fz​ · rw​about the pivot axisMR = Δsd​ / Δzw​
Fig.
2
Title
The corner as a free-body diagram
Kind
Schematic, principle only, not to scale
Source
Drawn for this site
Note
The damper sits on joints free to rotate, so it carries axial force only, no side load and no bending. The tie rod has the wishbone's length and its inboard joint on the wishbone's pivot axis: bump steer zero by geometry. The moment balance shows the vertical load only.
Register excerpt: 5 checks, with load case, loading, material, the source of each check, and masked values
SystemPartLoad caseLoadingForces, momentsStressesMaterialSafety factors (tension, shear, bearing)Source
SuspensionWishbone tubesBraking + cornering, 0.55 g + 0.55 gBending and axial forceAL 6061 T6FEA
SuspensionWishbone tubesMax heave, 2 gBendingAL 6061 T6Bending+Torque
SuspensionDamper mountMax heave, 3 g, stiffest damperTensionAL 6061 T6FEA
SuspensionSteering knuckleMax braking, 0.7 gTensionAL 7075 T6FEA
SuspensionKnuckle bearingBraking + cornering, 0.55 g + 0.55 gBearing reactionBearingBearing Loads
Fig.
3
Title
The corner in the register: 5 of 77 checks
Kind
Workbook extract, values masked
Source
The project's design calculators

More depth: the motion ratio, the camber gain and why the corner is built this way

Designed for manufacture

I redrew the suspension mounts, which the packaging study had left as complex 3D forms, as laser-cut and bent sheet metal with every pickup where it was, and checked them again in FEA against the same load cases. I carried the change into the drawings and the bill of materials and sourced the machining and fabrication suppliers; the mounts cost much less to make.

Steering, brakes and drivetrain

I designed the clean-sheet steering knuckle and joints the new geometry needed, with the rotor, hub, caliper, disc adaptors and drive axle of the same corner, and checked each for stress and fatigue against its own load cases. Fig. 4 is three of those checks from the register: the caliper adaptor, the drive shaft and the hub splines, each signed off by FEA or a hand calculation.

Register excerpt: 3 checks, with load case, loading, material, the source of each check, and masked values
SystemPartLoad caseLoadingForces, momentsStressesMaterialSafety factors (tension, shear, bearing)Source
BrakesCaliper adaptorMax braking, 0.7 gTensionAL 7075 T6FEA
DrivetrainDrive shaftMax accelerationTorsionAL 7075 T6Bending+Torque
SuspensionHub splinesMax braking, 0.7 gShearAL 7075 T6Spline
Fig.
4
Title
Brakes and drivetrain in the register: 3 of 77 checks
Kind
Workbook extract, values masked
Source
The project's design calculators

The belt drivetrain of the motor-assisted drive serves front, rear or four-wheel drive from one layout; I routed it with the belt supplier for the hardest case, the multi-bend four-wheel-drive path, and chose the bearings from SKF's catalogue against life and friction calculations.

Two calculation tools

I built two calculation tools: a linked performance model (Fig. 5) for what the vehicle can do with a given layout, and twelve design calculators (Fig. 6) for what each part has to carry.

formulas
288
linked sheets
3
calculation blocks
30
dependencies between blocks
68
of them across sheets
24
drive layouts
4
use cases
5

User Interface: inputs

Vehicle Data

Vehicle Dynamics

 

 

 

User Interface: calculations

User Interface: outputs

User Interface: inputs

  • Vehicle specs 5 f
  • Cornering case
  • Stopping case
  • Power case 1 f
  • Top-speed case 1 f
  • Gradient case

Vehicle Data

  • Basic vehicle data 6 f
  • Masses and CG, by assembly 55 f
  • Powertrain and drivetrain settings 19 f

Vehicle Dynamics

  • Vehicle data, as used 23 f
  • Scenario input 1 f

Vehicle Dynamics, continued

  • Static weight distribution 5 f
  • Lateral weight transfer 10 f
  • Longitudinal weight transfer 5 f
  • Load on a slope 8 f

Vehicle Dynamics, continued

  • Tyre forces and limits 20 f
  • Braking 2 f
  • Cornering 1 f
  • Static rollover angles 3 f

Vehicle Dynamics, continued

  • Motor power 13 f
  • Top speed 13 f
  • Gradient 12 f

User Interface: calculations

  • Motor power 28 f
  • Top speed 6 f
  • Gradient 6 f

User Interface: outputs

  • Max cornering speed 1 f
  • Min stopping distance 1 f
  • Required motor power 15 f
  • Achievable top speed 15 f
  • Achievable gradient 13 f
Fig.
5
Title
The performance model's calculation graph
Kind
Model graph, from the formulas
Source
The project's performance model
Note
Blocks are the sheets' own sections; a number is the formulas in that block; a line is a dependency, thicker for more references, in the accent when it crosses sheets. 71 of 288 formulas cross a sheet: change any input and every output updates.

1. Vehicle level

Tyre Data

Lateral force against slip angle and load for the candidate tyres

Weight Transfer

Masses, track, wheelbase, CG and roll centres to the vertical, longitudinal and lateral force at each wheel, per case

Corner

Lateral acceleration from speed and corner radius

Drivetrain

Air, rolling and gradient resistance, power and ratios for front, rear and four-wheel drive

F at each wheel, per case

2. Loads into the structure

Chassis Loadcases

Seven cases, four corners: the forces at the wishbone and damper pickups

Steering Torque

Castor, trail, kingpin inclination and scrub radius to the steering forces and effort

Spokes

Wheel loads in cornering and combined cases

forces at the pickups

3. Part checks

Bending+Torque

Shaft bending and torsion, principal stresses and safety factors by material

Spline

Shear and compressive stress in splined shafts and hubs

Bearing Loads

Static and dynamic bearing reactions against the catalogue ratings

Fatigue

Alternating and mean stress, surface, loading and size factors; life in kilometres from the S-N data and the load encounters per kilometre, with the Goodman, Gerber and Soderberg mean-stress criteria

FEA

Outside the workbook: 26 of the register's checks, with load cases from Chassis Loadcases

stresses, life, safety factors

4. Register

Loadcase - FOS

77 checks on 48 parts in four systems: load case, loading, stresses, material, three safety factors and the source of each check

Fig.
6
Title
The design calculators: twelve sheets in the order the loads travel
Kind
Calculator map, values masked
Source
The project's design calculators
Note
One arrow per stage, labelled with what it carries: each stage's results are the next stage's inputs. Dashed: outside the workbook.
Chassis load cases: forces at the suspension pickups for each case and corner, values masked
Load caseLoad factorPickup loadedHeld fixedFLFRRLRR
FzFyFxFzFyFxFzFyFxFzFyFx
Max shockdamperwishbone, fore and aft
Max heave2 gwishbone, foredamper
wishbone, aft
Max accelerationwishbone, foredamper
wishbone, aft
Max braking0.7 gwishbone, foredamper
wishbone, aft
Max cornering0.9 gwishbone, foredamper
wishbone, aft
Acceleration + cornering0.55 g + 0.55 gwishbone, foredamper
wishbone, aft
Braking + cornering0.55 g + 0.55 gwishbone, foredamper
wishbone, aft

Held fixed: the wishbone, fore and aft, when the damper pickup is loaded; the damper in every other case.

Fig.
7
Title
Chassis load cases: seven cases, four corners, 156 values
Kind
Workbook extract, load factors shown, forces masked
Source
The project's design calculators

The performance model (Fig. 5) answers the design questions directly: choose a drive layout, chain or belt, a road surface, a slope and a wind, and its three linked sheets return the maximum cornering speed, stopping distance, required motor power, top speed, gradient capability and a g-g diagram.

The twelve design calculators (Fig. 6) carry the loads in the order they travel, from tyre data and weight transfer to the forces at each pickup, then to each part's stresses, fatigue life and safety factors. Each stage's results are the next stage's inputs, and the register at the end names the source of every check. Fig. 7 is the hand-off from the vehicle to the parts: seven load cases, from maximum shock to braking while cornering, as forces at the wishbone and damper pickups of all four wheels.

More depth: what each calculator computes, the combined cases and the whole register, 2 more figures

Release package

I released production-level 2D drawings and a bill of materials with the system structure, part numbers, quantities and the cumulative weight of every part; summed, it gives the mass in the title block.